| Richard D. Finch - Artist Statement |
|
Visual art has long been recognized for its historical, social, and cultural significance and relevance. Our first works of art—e.g. Paleolithic Era cave paintings discovered at Lascaux (Dordogne), France, and dating from 15,000-10,000 b.c.—are images and symbols “interpreted as an attempt to gain magical control over the animals on which the Stone Age culture depended …” (Russell 2). Other works of art have investigated and established ideals of beauty, pictured religious deities and iconography, provided social commentary and criticism, and otherwise communicated ideas both universal and particular to the human condition. My research and creative work in the visual arts reflect an understanding of these functions of art. My works draw upon many traditional means and forms, and I attempt to extend these traditions as I develop my own voice and its fulfillment in the making of art. The subjects for my artworks—the human figure and still life objects—connect with subjects that have served many artists, cultures, and historical periods, even from antiquity. We see clearly the emergence of interpretive figurative artworks through the revelation of art historical precedents. Conventional and systematic approaches to the depiction of human figures throughout early Egyptian culture, Roman art, Greek civilization, and medieval illuminated manuscripts were replaced by increasingly individualistic approaches from the Renaissance, Baroque, and Romantic periods and into the myriad of styles in the twentieth century (Goldstein). Furthermore, the development of metaphoric and symbolic uses for still life objects is well documented, particularly in the works by the Dutch still life painters of the seventeenth century. Although the use of still life subjects by these artists was at first pragmatic[1], artists such as Jan Vermeer and later, in the eighteenth century, Jean Baptiste Chardin began to depict everyday objects in ways that elevated their commonplace status to one of elegance and importance by infusing “a quiet dignity in domestic scenes” (Russell 334). Contemporary uses of the human figure and still life objects vary widely and convey richly innovative expressions[2].
My research
and artistic agenda focus on the study of this rich
history and the
emergence
of interpretive uses of the human figure and still life
objects as
subjects;
the contemplation of my own relevant perceptions,
observations, and
life
experiences; and intensive studio activities that
culminate in visual
works of
art that express my views about these subjects, their
interactions, and
their
references to larger and more universal ideas. I
employ drawing, painting (primarily watercolor), and
printmaking as the principal media by
which I explore
and
express ideas in two-dimensional form; the investigation,
methodology, and development in my work rely strongly on
serial imagery and sequential composition. Works
Cited
Bergström, Ingvar. Dutch
Still-Life Painting in the Seventeenth Century. Goldstein, Nathan. Figure
Drawing: The Structure,
Anatomy, and
Expressive Design of Human Form. 5th
ed. Russell, Stella
Pandell. Art in
the World. 4th
ed. [1] [2]
Examples include
artworks by such
established
contemporary artists as Alberto Giacometti,
who communicated his
existentialist
views of man by depicting human figures
dominated by shifting,
atmospheric
environments and shallow spaces; Giorgio
Morandi, who spent a lifetime
investigating
through painting and printmaking the visual
and metaphorical
possibilities of
arrangements of bottles on table tops; Jim
Dine, who in the last third
of the
twentieth century saw the human figure as
the only meaningful subject
available
to him, but subsequently depicted bathrobes
as stand-ins for his
self-portrait;
and Jack Beal, who depicted objects and
figures for the symbolic
potentials
inherent in their juxtapositions. |
Richard D. Finch
College of Fine Arts
Illinois State University
rdfinch@ilstu.edu